« August 2008 | Main | October 2008 »
I didn't stick this in the rewind last night, but since I'd already recorded it and everyone's talking about Akers today, take a look at this shot of the second field goal he missed. Watch how the flags at the top of the goalposts are blowing hard from left to right just until the moment of the kick, when the wind suddenly dies.
You still have to make 'em -- and maybe aiming for the middle would help -- but that's just bizarre.
I'm going to have a bit of a different posting schedule this week due to some business-related travel. Video rewind tonight while I still have DVR access -- and the fresh scars to not want to watch MNF -- and then other stuff later in the week.
- - - - - -
There wasn't a smoking gun. I re-watched every snap of that game looking for what it was the Bears did differently on defense -- or we stopped doing on offense -- to find out how a team could go from looking competent to stagnant over the course of four periods. Didn't find anything. The Bears did the same stuff all game ... we did the same stuff all game ... but an unfortunate mix of poor plays, bad decisions and puzzling playcalls handed this team the first head-scratching loss of the 2008 season.
But you knew that already, in general terms, so let's talk specifics.
- - - - - -
The Bears' offense did three things early to try to throw the Eagles off balance:
Point #1 is the simplest. If you go without a huddle, the defense doesn't have time to make substitutions. That keeps the base defense on the field and also gives less time for the coaches to get their fancy blitz packages in.
Point #2 seemed to get us all game. Orton would go to the line, bark out an extended hard count, watch how our guys moved around, then adjust playcalls accordingly. On several occasions -- though not every time -- this paid off, as the new play neatly avoided the pressure we were bringing. I wondered both last night and again tonight why we don't do a better job checking out of those blitzes once we tip our hand. (And also if we could be slightly better at, you know, not tipping our hand.)
Point #3 is a little more involved. Early in the game, the Eagles were flipping the cornerback when the Bears went to a twins formation (putting both cornerbacks on the same side as the two receivers). I don't remember seeing Johnson do this much in the past, but it has the advantage of putting your two best cover guys in the vicinity of the opponent's two best receivers. I'm guessing the thinking was avoiding an LB on Hester match-up.
The problem is that the Bears were using those guys basically as decoys. They lined up two tight ends on the other side, with those guys being the primary target on the play. That put an athletic tight end like Greg Olsen on an unproven pass defender on Chris Gocong, and is exactly what caused the first touchdown. Olsen ran a little wheel route (out to the flat then upfield) and Gocong was left well behind.
The Bears stayed with this look -- hitting on it a couple more times -- until their possession that started at 11:40 in the second quarter. On first-and-10 from the Philly 47, they came out in that same look, the Eagles didn't flip the corner, and Orton called a timeout after checking out the coverage. I'm guessing that the change is what got him.
- - - - - -
Also on that Olsen touchdown, that was a catch, guys. The ball may have moved a millimeter in his hands as he brought it in, but he clearly had control while the first foot was down. As a football fan, I'd be disappointed to see some kind of hyperlegalistic review that took that away.
- - - - - -
Speaking of hyperlegalistic reviews, please explain to me why this:
Draws an illegal formation penalty while this:
Is perfectly fine?
They're lined up the exact same way in both shots. But somehow, the officials thought the first formation was illegal while the second one was just peachy. (For your viewing convenience, I've highlighted the douchebag ref who called the penalty that cost us the roughing the passer call in the first picture.)
- - - - - -
Now, I understand you may say that you prefer hyper-legalistic officiating that gets in the way of the game on the field. You're in favor of those kinds of weak sauce calls.
Ok great, but then where was Mr. Call Everything On Special Teams during the only big Devin Hester return of the night:
Look, I don't know if he would have made the play or not. And it's not like the Bears' anemic offense scored on this drive anyway. I'm just tired of our special teams getting called for stuff all the time that I see opponents getting away with.
Both ways, ref, both ways.
- - - - - -
While we're on the topic of whiny ref complaints, didja notice that Lance Briggs managed to plant vicious helmet-to-helmet hits on both Buckhalter and Booker in this game? Did you also notice that no flags were thrown either time? (Totally defensible.) Did you also notice that Madden and Michaels neglected to mention on both occasions that the hits, while aesthetically pleasing, were both somewhat at odds with "the emphasis that [the commissioner's] office has placed on developing and enforcing rules designed to protect players from injury, including concussions." (Not defensible.)
No fine came last week on the H2H hit that gave Hunt his concussion. That was a fair decision, in my mind, due to the way in which Hunt somewhat lowered his shoulder to take on the blow. Briggs, however, should be a little lighter in the wallet this time next week.
- - - - - -
A couple weeks ago in the Cowboys video rewind, I questioned why Brodrick Bunkley wasn't making more disruptive plays. He seemed fine holding his ground, but wasn't doing anything beyond that.
Two weeks later, I think we have our answer: it wasn't Bunk -- Cowboys center Andre Gurode is just really, really good.
I've watched Bunkley very closely the past couple weeks. The guy's been making plays all over the place. Against Chicago, he was frequently matched up against center Olin Kreutz, who by reputation is one of the better centers in the league. Bunk whipped him. Not every time and not in every situation, but enough to confirm the Pittsburgh observations. I take it back, Bunk. Keep doing your thing.
- - - - - -
Given that a talented offensive skill position player would have been helpful to have on hand on Sunday night, the tackle combo of Patterson and Bunkley is still just really a pleasure to watch. Let's get Bunk locked up to his long-term deal so we can enjoy these guys working together for the next 10 years.
- - - - - -
Which is why it was so %@#!$ surprising to see both of those players on the sideline for the most important defensive snap of the game.
I'm not kidding. Fourth quarter, 2:43 on the clock, only one timeout left for the good guys, Bears bring in three receivers so we respond by bringing in our entire nickel personnel package. Not just an extra corner. Not another safety. The whole shebang.
Which means, ladies and gentlemen, the play of the game is upon us and the Eagles roll out Darren Howard and Dan Klecko in the middle of their line and as a bonus leave a safety back deep, only putting seven men in the box.
The Bears ran for 10 yards.
Of all the boneheaded coaching decisions in this game, that might have been the boneheadedest. Of COURSE they're not going to pass. They're the friggin Bears. And if they do, heck, it's gonna be quick, knock it down and save a timeout.
No. We bring in the lightbutts, who promptly get shoved out of the way.
Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggghhhhhhh.
- - - - - -
Second place: why did we not challenge this:
His elbow was clearly down. And don't tell me you need the video to be sure. This may even be a couple of frames after he hit the ground, but I wanted to bend over backwards to be fair.
Note the down and distance. That's potentially a four-point play right there. What a coincidence.
- - - - - -
The guy making that tackle is Omar Gaither. I thought Omar was a little tentative to start the year. It probably didn't help that he was coming out so often for Sean Considine (that would kill anyone's confidence). But he really seemed to be playing downhill in this game. He posted nine solo tackles in this game and made a handful of plays, defined as doing more than just catching the guy when he gets to you.
I was really impressed with Gaither in this game. I think he played the best of all the linebackers. And I'm not just saying that for reasons that will become apparent tomorrow.
- - - - - -
Other defensive notes:
- - - - - -
For the offense, is it cool if we just pretend that game never happened? That this once-mighty scoring attack did not, in fact, start possessions at the Bears' 41, 35, 28, and 31 yard lines with only six points to show for it?
No, you want breakdowns. Pushy readers. Onward.
- - - - - -
Chicago safety Mike Brown is a better player than I realized. On the Eagles' first play of their second drive, he came flying out of the secondary to hold Buck to a two-yard gain when everyone else was blocked up. (It may have helped his play recognition, however, that this was the play where Herremans false-started by pulling outside Thomas, so the Eagles decided to huddle up and run the exact same play to the other side. Tricky.)
Brown also ended the Eagles two-minute drill at the end of the second quarter by coming all the way across the field to drop Jackson for a short gain after he ran an underneath route with two other receivers running off all the coverage. Serious range displayed there.
Brown was also responsible for separating Schobel from the ball down by the goal line on the Eagles first touchdown drive. I could probably separate Schobel from the ball though -- Boo! ... drop -- so we won't give him too much credit there.
Closing out this series of Mike Brown plays, if you're a football geek and plan to re-watch the game, compare the running play described above to the first running play of the second half. Everything else was the same, but this time Brown had walked down into the box away from playside. He saw things just as quickly, but from down there he didn't have the same angle and got caught up in the trash. It ended up being a 25 yard gain. It's just funny that bringing a safety up actually weakened the run defense.
- - - - - -
Continuing the obsession with this play, why has it taken this long to get the guard pull into the running game? And why are we finally rolling it out now, when the guy that play was basically designed for is still on the bench with back trouble?
- - - - - -
Let's talk about something good instead. Check out this one route by DeSean Jackson. Yes, it was zone coverage and the corner has to keep outside leverage, but as you can see pre-snap, there are literally no other receivers on this side of the field, so the cornerback shouldn't be leaving DeSean:
Now watch what he does to that cornerback:
That, folks, is separation. (And it looked even more impressive before YouTube's crappy compression got to it.)
- - - - - -
Now let's take a quick look at two guys so many people seem to think are just as good as LJ Smith. Here's a look at the blocking of Brent Celek on a third-and-short play in the middle of the second quarter:
That came just before the missed 50-yarder by Akers. And yeah, Hunt's block wasn't great either, but it's pretty tough to stop a guy when he can just run right through the massive crease the guy next to you opened up.
As for the other other tight end here's the end-of-game goal line play everyone wants to see:
Yeah, we don't even need the fancy slo-mo stuff on that one.
Oh, you wanted one more look? Here ya go:
I don't even know what to say.
- - - - - -
Other offensive notes:
Ok, yeah, I tried to stick a pretty face on this one (see next post).
Didn't work. Can't sleep.
What a terrible loss.
... and this won't be popular.
But the Eagles are 2-2 after four games, just the way we thought they'd be when the schedule came out. And the offense has shown flashes of utter brilliance without even having all the best players out there. I'm still very optimistic about the season, based upon what we've seen so far.
Things that a Westbrook-less loss does not prove:
That the NFC East standings will look anything like they do currently in three months.
Bottom line: This was a bad loss in the sense that it could be the difference come playoff time between: having home-field advantage / winning the division / grabbing the wild card / watching from home. But given all the guys who were out -- and particularly the one guy who was out -- we'd be reading way too much into this loss to take it as some kind of death knell for the season.
And I think we can be pretty sure Westbrook is now going to play next week.
I don't even know what to say.
On the one hand, the Eagles just proved it's hard to win a game without your #1 WR, #1 TE, Pro Bowl RG and All World RB.
On the other hand, that completely sucked. Defense stumbled early -- and should NOT be let off the hook for allowing three touchdowns to Kyle ^%$#@! Orton -- but then handed the offense opportunity after opportunity to get this thing taken care of.
Which they couldn't. Because why, see above.
Let's see, people to blame right now, in no particular order:
And that may not even exhaustive.
Shit.
UPDATE: Aw crap, they just showed the side view. Didn't look good.
SECOND UPDATE: But that view couldn't have come at this point, because of the body on the left in the way. So carry on.
FINAL UPDATE: From the side shot, it seems pretty clear he didn't get in. Sorry guys.
You make the call (click for fullsize):
Teams have clearly decided to challenge out linebackers in coverage. It's working.
Guess we'll call this the open thread to if you have anything to rant about.
UPDATE: Why is it that Trent Cole's "personal" foul last week took precedence but this one this week offsets?
Also, that's two illegal formations on punts this year. Segrest, get your team's shit together.
Last week I forgot to forget I suck at this and went 5-11. This week we're back to not thinking too hard.
NFL.com's "anatomy of a play" breaks down a couple of Eagles' sacks from last week against the Steelers: http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80b1e56c
(ht)
(I mentioned a few weeks ago that I felt like my Friday game previews kind of sucked and that I wanted to try something else. Here's something else.)
One part of the DirecTV NFL Sunday Ticket package I've never taken enough advantage of is the 30-minute "short cut" provided for each game during the week. I've had my reasons for staying away ("Yes, honey, I am watching NFL football on a Tuesday night..."), but I think I've hit on a way to finally bring something to the table with my game preview columns: watch the next week's foe and then write about what I saw.
I know, revolutionary. Should have thought of this years ago.
Anyway, on to five things I learned about the Bears from watching last week's game fast forward style:
1) The Bears clearly should have won that game. If that game had been played 10 times, Chicago would have won at least eight. They controlled the clock, completely shut down the Bucs' running attack, and had maybe a dozen chances to put that away. I lost track of the number of sure interceptions they dropped. Even in overtime, Orton hit one of their receivers right at the TB 32-yard-line ... and the guy dropped the ball. If not for a bunch of fluke occurrences and an inexplicable hot streak from Brian Griese, Chicago has a much prettier 2-1 record coming in to this game.
2) Kyle Orton looks like a real NFL quarterback. He doesn't look like a really good NFL quarterback, but he's certainly not tripping over himself back there. Two things I noticed in particular: 1) he moves constantly in the pocket, never seems to get set, and throws almost every time off his back foot; and, 2) He plays the game kind of like Koy Detmer with a legitimate arm. I swear I'm not saying that just because of the beard thing. He really does look like Detmer back there, except that he can also get the ball downfield.
3) The Bears' defense really jammed the line in this game. Both Reid and Mornhinweg have mentioned this week that Chicago has changed some of the things it's doing on defense. It was really noticeable in this game, as Chicago jammed all three linebackers -- and often even a safety -- up to the line of scrimmage, kind of like the way the Eagles did against Pittsburgh, but more so. Unless it was almost a sure passing situation, they were stacking that box.
(Note: I'd be surprised to see Chicago play the Eagles the same way. I'm sure it will be part of the package, but that's not Brian Griese standing back there. You get too aggressive with this Eagles' offense and suddenly you're going to be doing a lot of chasing downfield. With Westbrook either limited or out, I still think the way to defend Philly is just to keep everything in front and dare the other guys to make enough plays to beat you.)
4) Matt Forte is a good looking running back, but the rushing offense as a whole doesn't look that dangerous. I really like Matt Forte. The guy is big, seems to have good vision, nice speed. Really seems like the whole package, if perhaps a little oversized for your typical every-down back. But the Bears' rushing statistics were ultimately pretty misleading, as 38 yards came on a fake punt and 21 yards were the result of six Orton scrambles. Take those away and you have 30 carries for 99 yards between the two backs (mostly Forte). It looks like a "plugging ahead" running game rather than a "big play" running game, so I don't expect to see the Eagles struggle too much with slowing it down.
(Another Note: I have been known to be wrong about these kinds of things before.)
5) What is the %$#@! deal with Brandon Lloyd? The guy had six catches for 124 yards last week and flashed the hands and playmaking ability that enticed the Redskins into dumping all that money into him a couple years ago. That's three times the number of receptions he had all of last year. Generally I'm a believer in the idea that situations make players, but really, Chicago? Kyle Orton? What is going on with this guy? (Although he may not be 100 percent this week.)
Bonus Observation: Not to sound like a broken record, but Eagles fans unsatisfied with the team's quarterback situation should really be forced to go back and watch the 101 passes tossed in this game by Griese and Orton. They were both consistently good on the checkdown stuff, but beyond that, shweeooo. We're talking guys being missed by five yards in all directions. Ugly.
May 28, 2008
If you send me a heads-up on something, please let me know if you'd like me to use your name or just go by "a reader." I can't use everything, but I like to give credit where it's due.
Email Me
 |
Hot Tickets |
| Super Bowl Tickets (please take me with you) |
Recent Comments