Matching Up With The Division
The Eagles' offseason additions are by no means done -- and yeah, I know what you're thinking *cough* fitzgerald *cough* -- and while that would of course be tremendously awesome, I'm mostly talking about the draft and whatever hole-patching, minor free agents the Eagles see fit to add between now and training camp.
So now we wait.
Most everyone has noticed by now that the Eagles were by far the most active NFC East team in free agency. The Giants had mountains of cap room but didn't see the need to give much of it to anyone. They also lost a few semi-key contributors. The Cowboys picked up Zach Thomas and that's about it -- although the mere speculation of a Moss/Owens receiving corps had me spitting up my coffee a week ago. And the Redskins finally ran out of money.
The more interesting question is what, if anything, has changed? Do the Eagles match up better against the teams that make up 37.5 percent of their schedule than they did a few weeks ago? Let's take a look.
New York Giants
Challenges: Pass rush, excellent screen defense and Plaxico Burress.
I think so far the Eagles are one-for-three here, but that could change if Lito gets moved. Because the Eagles have made no moves so far on offense, not much has changed with the first two challenges. The best way to back off a strong rush is to run the football. The Eagles can already do that. The second best way is to burn the blitzers deep. I'm not sure they're in any improved position to do so, although pending a shake-up of the offensive line this summer, that could change. We certainly haven't added (yet) the kind of deep threat who makes defensive coordinators think twice about sending the house.
Furthermore, we're still looking at Westbrook as options one, two and three in the offense, so it's not like the Giants are going to forget about him and open up our screen options against them again.
The one place where we're clearly better is with Plaxico Burress. Not just because Asante gives us another (better) primary coverage option, but also because a secondary with three very strong cornerbacks means we can hopefully shut down the other guys one-on-one and drape so much coverage on Plax that Eli is forced to look somewhere else.
Notice that the second part of that equation changes if we end up trading Lito.
Dallas Cowboys
Challenges: Offensive diversity and firepower, Ellis and Ware
It remains to be seen whether Chris Clemons gives us the kind of opposite-side pass rush pressure needed to compensate for the fact that Flozell Adams completely dominates Trent Cole every time the two match up. However, the secondary issues discussed above really come into play here, with the Eagles perhaps able to match up with guys like Owens and Witten even on the days when the rush isn't getting to Romo. No one can really cover Witten one-on-one, but I like our chances better with Sheldon than with Hanson, Gocong, or whatever safety is healthy that week.
Nothing on the offensive side suggests we're better able to handle the unique challenges presented by the Cowboys' fantastic OLB pairing. Twenty-seven points in two games suggests we better come up with something, however.
Washington Redskins
Challenges: Quick wide receivers, Chris Cooley, not sucking when we play them
Starting to see a trend here? As much as everyone wants to get Larry Fitzgerald -- including me -- there's a lot to be said for the secondary as currently constructed. All three divisional opponents present varied passing game threats that are much easier to contain if we can throw out Asante, Lito and Sheldon as a group. It's something to think about.
As for that last bit, with a fully-healthy McNabb, the Eagles should be fine against the Washington franchise this year.
And yeah, I'm feeling that dismissive about the team I thought would be the surprise challenger to the Eagles last year. Burn me once...


Recent Comments